PUI S&S. CUUR IA USE RM. owt Cee
ARLINGTON. VA 22004-2490
TUNETY - ow . ;
Pern, ER Lhe eetiwew sy wr PoE ways
Hep a Ce bp bpp etre tpoapep: pesmempe
' at
HD ;
Decket No. NR7503-l4
mary ee a ad
tet et A ae et
From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To: Secretary of the Navy
D
Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. 1552
Encl: (1) DD Form 149 dtd 4 Jun 14 w/attachments
(2) HOMC MIQ memo dtd 6 Jan 15
i... Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject,
hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this
Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be
corrected by removing the undated service record page 11
(“Administrative Remarks (1070)") entry whose first sentence reads
as follows: “Counseled this date concerning the following
aeficiencies: You violated Marine Corps Bases Japan Order 1050.5:
wanerty Euacy order. 2 com: tf ine contested entry 1s et Taz i.
WH weviewed Petitioner's &Liegations of error and injustice on
, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that
the corrective accion indicated below should be talzen on the
availiable evidence of record. Documentary material considered by
the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable
statutes, regulations and policies.
+
pe
ur (
3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining
to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice, finds as follows:
a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and regulations
within the Department of the Navy.
b. In correspondence at enclosure (2), the Headquarters Marine
Corps office with cognizance over the subject matter of Petitioner’s
case has commented to the effect that the reguest has merit and
warrants favorable action.
CONCLUSION:
Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
especially tu light of enclosure {2}, tne Board finds tne existence
of an error warranting the following corrective action:
RECOMMENDATION:
a. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by removing the
undated service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070) ")
entry whose first sentence reads as follows: “Counseled this date
concerning the following deficiencies: You violated Marine Corps
Bases Japan Order 1050.5: Liberty Buddy Order.” This is to be
accomplished by physically removing the page 11 on which the entry
appears, or completely obliterating the entry so it cannot be read,
rather than merely lining through it.
b. That any material or entries inconsistent with or relating
to the Board's recommendation be corrected, removed or completely
expunged from Petitioner's record and that no such entries or
Material be added to the record in the future.
4. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board
for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations,
Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that a quorum was present at the
Board's review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true
and complete record of the Board’s proceedings in the above entitled
matter,
Sontiin do lyric
JONATHAN S. RUSKIN
Recorder
5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6 (e)
of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records
(32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e)) and having assured
compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the
_ rere |
foregoing corrective action taken under the authority of reference
(a), has been approved by the Board on behalf of the Secratary of
the Navy.
KUBERT J. Uf NETL
Executive Director
i
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 02415-09
application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting that his naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 1i(b) (“Administrative Remarks (1070)"} entry dated i? ‘CONCLUSION: Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, the Board substantially concurs with enclosure (2) in finding the existence of an error and injustice warranting partial relief, specifically, removal of the page 11(d) entry dated 8 March 2002, with the rebuttal dated 12 March 2002, as...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 02283-09
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure {1}, with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by removing the weight control entry for 24 January 2007 to 00000000; changing the “Proficiency” /"Conduct” marks for 31 July 2007, 31 January 2008 and 31 July 2008; and removing the lined through undated service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)")} entry and the page 11...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 10092-08
In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the Headquarters Marine Corps office having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in Petitioner's application has commented to the effect that removal of the undated page 11 entry referencing training on 9 February 2004 and the page 11 (a) entry dated 26 June 2008 is warranted because these entries were not signed by the commanding officer, but that the remaining entries should stand because a page 11 entry is required when a Marine is not...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 04804-10
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 JSR Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the undated service record page 11(d) (“Administrative Remarks (1070)") entry documenting a nonjudicial punishment of an unspecified date, a copy of which igs in enclosure...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 12640 12
The Board, consisting of Messrs. Clemmons, Gorenflo and Midboe, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 24 January 2013, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11(b) (“Administrative Remarks (1070) ") entry dated 5 August >010 and his undated rebuttal. d. That any material directed to be...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 00702-08
The Board, consisting of Messrs. Dietrich, J. Hicks and Pfeiffer, reviewed allegations of error and injustice on 6 November 2008, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that relief should be granted. That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected by removing the three service record page 11(d) (“Administrative Remarks (1070)”) entries dated 28 September 2006. That any material or entries inconsistent with or relating to the Board’s recommendation be corrected, removed or completely...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 04198-10
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)”) entry dated 6 August 2008, a copy of which is in enclosure (1). The Board, consisting of Messrs. Bowen, Chapman and Garst, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 28 May 2010, and pursuant to its...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08514-07
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)”) entry dated 1 August 2005 and her undated rebuttal, copies of which are in enclosure (1) at Tab A.2. The Board, consisting of Ms. Willis and Messrs. Grover and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 08954-09
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page il (“Administrative Remarks (1070)”) entries dated 17 January 2008 {two, concerning the January and February 2008 sergeant promotion periods) and 29 February 2008 (concerning the March 2008 sergeant promotion period) with his undated rebuttal. The Board,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 09529-08
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page lib (“Administrative Remarks (1070)"”) entry dated 13 June 2006, a copy of which is in enclosure (1) at Tab A. The Board, consisting of Messrs. W. Hicks, Ivins and Swarens, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 20 November 2008, and...